If the activity involves the commission of a sexual offence against any person, or.An activity that causes death or serious injury,.That is to say, an ASIO operative would be deemed to have committed a crime if they were to participate in any of the following activities under any circumstances: Section 35k (1) defines these activities as not being immune from liability for special intelligence conduct during special intelligence operations. While the Act does not define any activities specifically to be legal, that is, to grant immunity for any specific crime, it does provide exceptions that will not be granted immunity. The Director-General is not empowered to independently issue a warrant in relation to the investigation of terrorism. The prevention of suspects leaving Australia.Ordinary, frisk or strip search of suspects by AFP officers upon their detainment,.The detention of suspects by the Australian Federal Police, and their subsequent interrogation by ASIO officers,. The compulsory questioning of suspects,.When investigating terrorism, the Director-General may also seek a warrant from an independent judicial authority to allow: Īn ASIO officer may, without warrant, ask an operator of an aircraft or vessel questions about the aircraft or vessel, its cargo, crew, passengers, stores or voyage and to produce supporting documents relating to these questions. The Director-General also has the power to independently issue a warrant should a serious security situation arise and a warrant requested of the Attorney-General has not yet been granted. Conduct of an ordinary or frisk search of a person if they are at or near a premises specified in the warrant.Covert entry to and search of premises, including the removal or copying of any record or thing found therein, and.Remote access to computers, including alteration of data to conceal that access,.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |